Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Sign In | Register

Couple of very minor feature requests for the Syntax Editor Options
Mr C
Posted: Sunday, March 22, 2009 6:00:24 PM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/20/2008
Posts: 3
I am writing software currently that makes use of the Syntax Editor in a fashion more similar to a word-processor than a coder's editor. What would help would be the following, several of which I know would be pretty trivial.

An instant word count facility. I currently generate this on a low priority thread running every 5 seconds but wonder whether the internal data structure used for the text might mean there is a more efficient way of tracking this. In particular, the act of applying syntax layout to the text presumably involves a scan of the text anyway so perhaps it could be done during that pass.

A solid block cursor as an option for insert mode as well as overwrite. I have used the measurestring method on the editor control's graphics surface to derive the width of the underscore character and set that as the caretwidth but it seems to not want to go beyond a certain width, presumably to maintain it's visual distinction from the overwrite caret.

A markerlinebackcolor property so that a line with a particular marker type would have it's background color set, in a similar fashion to the caret line background color.

Most importantly, the facility to either specify a blank line be shown (as a visual gap, but not stored) after each hard return, or better still to specify an actual visual gap size after each hard return. This would have the effect of allowing paragraphs of text (long text lines wrapped over multiple screen lines) to be visually seperated from each other and would be a great help with generic editing facilities beyond that employed purely by a text editor.

Of the four, the first and last would be most helpful. Though I suspect the last is a very great deal more involved the first three.
eo_support
Posted: Sunday, March 22, 2009 8:04:25 PM
Rank: Administration
Groups: Administration

Joined: 5/27/2007
Posts: 24,217
Hi,

Thank you very much for your great suggestions. Even though our editor was primarily developed for code editor, I believe all four are technically possible based on our current architecture. I do expect the fourth one be more much more complicated than others though. We will look into these options and see if we can incorporate them into our next release.

Thanks!


You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.