Rank: Member Groups: Member
Joined: 7/14/2017 Posts: 17
|
I have a css animate,very simple:
<!DOCTYPE html> <html lang="en"> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> <title>Title</title> <style> .animateDiv{ width: 150px; height: 150px; background-color: aquamarine; animation: test 3s; } @keyframes test { from {margin-left: 0} to {margin-left: 50%} }
@-moz-keyframes test /* Firefox */ { from {margin-left: 0} to {margin-left: 50%} }
@-webkit-keyframes test /* Safari 和 Chrome */ { from {margin-left: 0} to {margin-left: 50%} }
@-o-keyframes test /* Opera */ { from {margin-left: 0} to {margin-left: 50%} } </style>
</head> <body> <div id="animateDiv" class="animateDiv"></div> </body> </html>
when I put it in webbrowser 2016,it's perfect when I put it in webbrowser 2017.2.14,it is very poor,the animation gets very laggy!I test EO.Total.2017.0.95.0,the same result occur why?
|
Rank: Administration Groups: Administration
Joined: 5/27/2007 Posts: 24,225
|
Hi,
We tested it here and we do not see any visible difference between Google Chrome browser and our TabbedBrowser sample application. Have you tried the page with Google Chrome browser and/or our TabbedBrowser sample application?
Thanks!
|
Rank: Member Groups: Member
Joined: 7/14/2017 Posts: 17
|
yes,i tested it on both chrome and TabbedBrowser If you have a good computer,such as i5 cpu or 8G memory,there is almost no difference but my program will run at a computer with 1037u cpu,2G memory,it has very a very big difference chrome is the best of course,no lag,very cool TabbedBrowser with eo.webbrowser 2016 is the second,some lag,but it is ok to use and TabbedBrowser with eo.webbrowser is the worst...very very slow,unacceptable...
|